Monday, December 7, 2020

2 Day workshop for NITIE Fauclty Student Startups

 2 Day Workshop for NITIE Faculty - Implementing AICTE Student Startups 


Respected Professors ..

 

NITIE is organizing online Case Teaching Workshop on _ Date_  (5pm to 8pm) for NITIE faculty members. This is part of our Director Sir’s initiative for faculty development. The Workshop will cover Implementing AICTE Student Startup Policy 2019

 

The Instructor for the Case Teaching Workshop is Professor.. ! 


The Case Teaching Workshop is mandatory for all Assistant Professor faculty members. Other interested faculty may give their interest by the revert mail or to Prof. ______ ; latest by _____   (Monday).  

 

Date: December 21 & 22  

Day: Monday & Tuesday 

Time: 5 pm to 8 pm 

Mode: Online - MS Teams 

 

We will be sharing the study material, Microsoft Team Link, and notes from the Instructor to the interested participants before the Case Teaching Workshop. 

 

Best Regards 

Neeraj 

Student Startups - Art and Science of embedding as part of curriculum

 Student Startup (SS) - Art and Science of Embedding as part of the curriculum

1.     Student Startup Case studies and Validated models

1.2 Videos 

      - VAAVE 

      -  Lal10.com

      -  Cashify 

      -  Matic 

      -  AB Trends 

      -  Cropwheel 

1.3 Literature

      -  OECD Report: Entrepreneurship in Education by Martin Lackus 2015

      -  Neck and Greene (2011)  Enterpreneurship Education: Known worlds and New Frontiers

      -  Saraswthy & Venkataraman (2010) Enterpreneurship as Method : Open questions for...

      -  

      -  

      -   

1.4 Quiz questions

2.     Designing Entrepreneurial teaching and learning methods

3.     Breakthrough literature on Student Enterprising

4.     Embedding (Fitting) Enterprising as part of Curriculum – Why it is a challenge faced by the academic faculty

5.     Student Enterprising – What it is not and what it is !

6.     New Educational Policy 2020 and scope for Student Enterprising

7.     Entrepreneurial Education - Envisioning the Future 

2. 

3

4

5

6

 

Student Startups Pictures

 









2019 Student Entrepreneurs sit for exams without Attendance! Media news

 1. NDTV Educaiton .. Search on On line. 


New Policy Allows Student Entrepreneurs Sit For Exams Without Minimum Attendance

In its "National Innovation and Startup Policy 2019 for Students and Faculty", MHRD has approved new regulations for higher education institutions to actively engage students, faculties and staff in innovation and entrepreneurship.

Education | Written by Maitree Baral, | Updated: Sep 28, 2019 6:20 pm IST | Source: NDTV
New Policy Allows Student Entrepreneurs Sit For Exams Without Minimum Attendance
MHRD has recently released the "National Innovation and Startup Policy 2019 for Students and Faculty."
New Delhi: 

"Student entrepreneurs should be allowed to sit for the examination, even if their attendance is less than the minimum permissible percentage, with due permission from the institute," as per the new innovation and startup policy released by the Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD). The MHRD's Innovation Cell or the MIC recently released the "National Innovation and Startup Policy 2019 for Students and Faculty."

It has also directed the institutes to allow their students to take a semester or year break to work on their startups. "Student entrepreneurs may earn academic credits for their efforts while creating an enterprise. Institute should set up a review committee for review of start up by students, and based on the progress made, it may consider giving appropriate credits for academics," it said.

Read: Institutes To Share Patent Rights With Students For On Campus Inventions

In the new policy higher education institutions have been asked to actively engage students, faculties and staff in innovation and entrepreneurship.

The policy has been prepared by the recommendation of a fifteen member committee constituted by Ministry of Human Resource Development and covers Intellectual Property ownership, revenue sharing mechanism, norms for technology transfer and commercialization. The policy covering IPR and entrepreneurship has been developed for the first time by MHRD. In November 2016 the AICTE had released a startup policy document and had sought feedback from stakeholders.

"The best universities around the world have evolved sound mechanisms for promoting and managing innovations. I believe that the 'Guidelines on National Innovation and Startup Policy 2019' will provide the required direction and support to a large number of universities and its affiliated institutions in India on handling Intellectual Property Rights, innovations and startup related issues," said DP Singh, Chairman, UGC.

In its endeavour to promote innovation among students, MHRD outlines the need to expedite decision making process. "Hierarchical barriers should be minimized and individual autonomy and ownership of initiatives should be promoted," the policy reads.

For supporting and funding startups, it has asked institutes to allocate minimum 1% of the total budget for startup related activities. It has also asked institutes to approach private and corporate sectors to generate funds, under Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).

"If India aims to become 5 trillion-dollar economy, then it needs to evolve systems and mechanisms to convert the present demographic dividend into high quality technical human resource capable of doing cutting edge research and innovation (R&I) and deep-tech entrepreneurship," said Abhay Jere, Chief Innovation Officer, MHRD.

"The guidelines highlight various important points including revenue sharing mechanism for licensing, ownership of IP, equity sharing mechanism between institute and startups incubated at institute," said Anil D Sahasrabudhe, Chairman, AICTE.

Monday, February 17, 2020

Student Enterprises - An alternate way to look at ! Article on Article

Student Enterprises - An alternate way to look at ! 

What makes student entrepreneurs? – On the relevance (and irrelevance)  of the university and the regional context for student start-ups


Heiko Bergmann University of St. Gallen, Swiss Research Institute of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Dufourstrasse 40a, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland Tel.: +41 71 224 7100 Email: heiko.bergmann@unisg.ch

Christian Hundt Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Geography Department, Urban and Regional Economics Universitätsstrasse 100, 44780 Bochum, Germany Email: christian.hundt@rub.de

Rolf Sternberg Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Economic and Cultural Geography Schneiderberg 50, 30167 Hannover, Germany Email: sternberg@wigeo.uni-hannover.de


Abstract: 

Student start-ups are a significant part of overall university entrepreneurship. Yet, we know little about the determinants of this type of start-ups and, specifically, the relevance of context effects. Drawing on organizational and regional context literature, we develop and test a model that aims to explain student entrepreneurship in a contextual perspective. Based on unique micro data and using multi-level techniques, we analyse nascent and new entrepreneurial activities of business and economics students at 41 European universities. Our analysis reveals that individual and contextual determinants influence students' propensity to start a business. While peoples’ individual characteristics are most important, the organizational and regional contexts also play a role and have a differentiated effect, depending on the source of the venture idea and the stage of its development. Organisational characteristics, like the prevalence of fellow students who have attended entrepreneurship education, influence whether students take action to start a new firm (nascent entrepreneurship) but do not seem to support the actual establishment of a new firm. In contrast, the latter is less dependent on the university context but more strongly influenced by regional characteristics. Overall, our study contributes to our understanding of the emergence of start-ups in the organizational context of universities and has implications for initiatives and programs that aim at encouraging students to become entrepreneurs.
-----------------------------


Student start-ups are a significant part of overall university entrepreneurship. 

1. Yes. Student Startups are a significant part of overall  University (Entrepreneurship ) Education 

Yet, we know little about the determinants of this type of start-ups and, specifically, the relevance of context effects. Drawing on organizational and regional context literature, we develop and test a model that aims to explain student entrepreneurship in a contextual perspective. Based on unique micro data and using multi-level techniques, we analyse nascent and new entrepreneurial activities of business and economics students at 41 European universities. 

2. (Business and Economic students ) beyond and including arts, social sciences.. Every subject A to Z of subject students .

Our analysis reveals that individual and contextual determinants influence students' propensity to start a business. While peoples’ individual characteristics are most important, …..

3. (Individual students' propensity  to start a business, regional contexts  is important ).  Propensity to start a business is  100 % irrelevant and every student starts a student business. 

the organizational and regional contexts also play a role and have a differentiated effect, depending on the source of the venture idea and the stage of its development. 

4. ( Organisational Contexts)  play an important role  to start a business. 

the organizational and regional contexts also play a role and have a differentiated effect, depending on the source of the venture idea and the stage of its development. 

5. (Source of venture idea  ).  Source of Idea comes from the subject studied 

the stage of its development. 

5. (Stage of venture development  ).  Stage of student startup is ..IRREELEVANT 

Organisational characteristics, like the prevalence of fellow students who have attended entrepreneurship education, ( irrelevant ) influence whether students take action to start a new firm (nascent entrepreneurship) but do not seem to support the actual establishment of a new firm ( IMPORTANT ). In contrast, the latter is less dependent on the university context but more strongly influenced by regional characteristics. ( Irrelevant ) Overall, our study contributes to our understanding of the emergence of start-ups in the organizational context of universities and has implications for initiatives and programs that aim at encouraging students to become entrepreneurs ( not to become enterpreneurs  but enterprising students ) .
------------------------------

Abstract: 

Student start-ups are a significant part of overall university entrepreneurship ( 1. EDUCATION ). Yet, we know little about the determinants of this type of start-ups and, specifically, the relevance of context effects. Drawing on organizational and regional context literature, we develop and test a model that aims to explain student entrepreneurship in a contextual perspective. Based on unique micro data and using multi-level techniques, we analyse nascent and new entrepreneurial activities of business and economics students ( 2. ANY SUBJECT STUDENTS )   at 41 European universities. Our analysis reveals that individual  ( 3. IRRELEVANT ) and contextual  ( 4. 0 YES, RELEVANT ) determinants influence students' propensity to start a business. While peoples’ individual characteristics are most important ( 3.0. IRRELEVANT ) , the organizational ( 4.1 RELEVANT ) and regional contexts also ( 4.2. IRRELEVANT ) play a role and have a differentiated effect, depending on the source of the venture idea ( Source is subject studied  ) and the stage ( 5. IRRELEVANT ) of its development. Organisational characteristics, like the prevalence of fellow students who have attended entrepreneurship education ( 6. IRRELEVANT ) , influence whether students take action to start a new firm (nascent entrepreneurship) but do not seem to support the actual establishment of a new firm. In contrast, the latter is less dependent on the university context ( 4.1 ONLY DEPENDENT FACTOR ) but more strongly influenced by regional characteristics ( 4.2 IRELEVANT ) . Overall, our study contributes to our understanding of the emergence of start-ups in the organizational context of universities and has implications for initiatives and programs that aim at encouraging students to become entrepreneurs ( 7 ENTERPRISING STUDENTS ) . 

1. Students startup are for education beyond enterpreneurship
2. Any subject students can engage in student startups, need not it is restricted to business and economics students
3. Individual student factors have no significance and they are irrelevant for student startups
4. Contextual factors like University academic system which plays crucial role, but not contextual factors
5. Stage and success of student startup is INVLALID measure. Valid metric is exposure and experimenting the method of starting up
6. There is no necessity of entrepreneurship education for a student startup .
7. Student startups make students turnout as enterprising people. Number of entrepreneurs is not the valid measure